Диссертационный совет
Back
Психологические исследования
Back
Вестник РХГА. Филологические науки
Back
Фотогалерея
Back
Menu
Абитуриентам
Back
Applicant's personal account
Programs for admission
Educations costs
Tuition benefits
Open days
FAQ
Dormitory
For applicants and parents
Applicants lists and orders for enrollment
Колледж
Back
About college
College news
Education programs
LMS
Студентам
Back
LMS
Learning calendars for academic year
Tuition fees
Military registration
Library
Social support measures for students
Academic center for psychological assistance
Career center
Аспирантам
Back
Final certification
Library
LMS
Military registration
Scientific specialties in RCAH
Learning calendars for academic year
Candidate's exams
Individual postgraduate work plan
Преподавателям
Back
Assistance to teachers
Using LMS and distance learning technologies
Academic Council
Contests and election documents
Conference of employees and students
Оплата обучения
Back
Bank requisites
Воинский учёт
Back
Military registration memo
Deferment from conscription
Conscript legislation
Citizens responsibility on not fulfilling duties for military registration
Библиотека
Back
Terms of use
Publications
RCAH Review
Archive
RCAH Review, 2024, Volume 25, Issue 3
DANGEROUS THEORY OF PRAYER. GOGOL’S APOCALYPTIC INPATIENCE AND THE STATE OF HEAVEN

DANGEROUS THEORY OF PRAYER. GOGOL’S APOCALYPTIC INPATIENCE AND THE STATE OF HEAVEN

2024
Volume №25
Issue 3
Publication date: 25.09.2024
Section: Теология
Prohorov Aleksandr Ivanovich
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2024.4.4.014
Download article file
Download article metadata file

Annotation

An important part of the non-fictional heritage of N. V. Gogol, which can be called theological, was practically unknown and not studied until the beginning of the 20th century. Subsequently, these texts became the reason why the name of Gogol is now included in the history of the formation of philosophical and theological thought in Russia. G. Florovsky, generally recognizing Gogol’s theological talent, sharply criticizes the religious reasoning of the Russian classic, primarily his “theory of prayer”, seeing in it a dangerous temptation for Christian believers. This article attempts to show that the fragment of Gogol’s letter to Yazykov chosen by Florovsky does not satisfy the requirements of pure theory, remaining a practical edification. Bringing Gogol’s thought to the necessary level of abstraction, as well as its correlation with his other thoughts about prayer in particular and Christianity in general, allows us not only to remove the main accusations from the “theory”, but also to use it as a link between Gogol’s ideas about individual duty of every Christian and his project of a theocratic state. This, in turn, clarifies Gogol’s ideas about the special importance of state service and his own place in Russian literature as a writer as a type of religious and public service.

Keywords

Gogol, prayer, service, state, monarchy, theocracy, author’s death

Literature

1. Belinskii V. G. (1953). Pis’mo N. V. Gogoliu [Letter to N. V. Gogol] // N. V. Gogol’ v
russkoi kritike: Sb. st. Moscow: Gos. izdat. khudozh. lit. P. 243–252. (In Russian).
2. Gogol’ N. V. — Prot. M. Konstantinovskomu. 12 ianvaria 1848 g. [Letter to
M. Konstantinovsky. January 12, 1848] // Gogol’ N. V. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem:
In 17 vol. Vol. 15: Perepiska. 1848–1852. (2009). Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskoi Patriarkhii.
P. 15–17. (In Russian).
3. Gogol’ N. V.—Iazykovu N. M. 4 noiabria 1843 g. [Letter to N. M. Yazykov. November
4, 1843] // Gogol’ N. V. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem: In 17 vol. Vol. 12: Perepiska
1842–1844. (2009). Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskoi Patriarkhii. P. 286–291. (In Russian).
4. Gogol’ N. V. (1992). Avtorskaia ispoved’ [Author’s Confession] // Dukhovnaia proza.
Moscow: Russkaia kniga. P. 279–322. (In Russian).
5. Gogol’ N. V. (1992). Vybrannye mesta iz perepiski s druz’iami [Selected Passages from
Correspondence with Friends] // Dukhovnaia proza. Moscow: Russkaia kniga. P. 35–278.
(In Russian).
6. Gogol’ N. V. (1992). Razmyshleniia o bozhestvennoi liturgii [Meditations on the Divine
Liturgy] // Dukhovnaia proza. Moscow: Russkaia kniga. P. 323–389. (In Russian).
7. Davidov M. (2005). Taina smerti Gogolia [The mystery of Gogol‘s death] // Ural. № 1.
2005. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/ural/2005/1/tajna- smerti-gogolya.html (last access
17.06.2024). (In Russian).
8. Zen’kovskii V. V. (2011). Istoriia russkoi filosofii [History of Russian Philosophy].
Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt. 880 p. (In Russian).
9. Merezhkovskii D. S. (1991). Gogol’ i chert (Issledovanie) [Gogol and devil
(Investigation)] // V tikhom omute: Stat’i i issledovaniia raznykh let. Moscow: Sovetskii
pisatel’. P. 213–309. (In Russian).
10. Ovsianiko- Kulikovskii D. N. (1989). Literaturno- kriticheskie raboty [Literary critical
works]. In 2 vol. Vol. 1. Stat’i po teorii literatury; Gogol’; Pushkin; Turgenev; Chekhov. Moscow:
Khudozh. lit. 542 p. (In Russian).
11. Sartakov E. V. (2014). “Vybrannye mesta iz perepiski s druz’iami” N. V. Gogolia
i russkaia konservativnaia zhurnalistika 1841–1846 gg.: Teoriia gosudarstvennosti [Gogol‘s
“Selected Passages From Correspondence With Friends” And Russian Conservative Journalism
of 1841–1846: The Theory Of Statehood] // Russkaia literatura i zhurnalistika v dvizhenii
vremeni. 2014. № 1. P. 192–211. (In Russian).
12. Florovskii G. (2006). Puti russkogo bogosloviia [Ways of Russian Theology]. Minsk:
Belorussky Ekzarkhat Publ. 608 p. (In Russian).

The research was carried out at Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University with the support of
the Russian Science Foundation, project No 22–18–00214, https://rscf.ru/en/project/22–18–00214/
Социальные сети
ВКонтакте
Telegram
YouTube
Если Вы увидели на сайте неточность или ошибку - пожалуйста, напишите на электронную почту webmaster@rhga.ru
© Русская христианская гуманитарная академия