Диссертационный совет
Back
Психологические исследования
Back
Вестник РХГА. Филологические науки
Back
Фотогалерея
Back
Menu
Абитуриентам
Back
Applicant's personal account
Programs for admission
Educations costs
Tuition benefits
Open days
FAQ
Dormitory
For applicants and parents
Applicants lists and orders for enrollment
Колледж
Back
About college
College news
Education programs
LMS
Студентам
Back
LMS
Learning calendars for academic year
Tuition fees
Military registration
Library
Social support measures for students
Academic center for psychological assistance
Career center
Аспирантам
Back
Final certification
Library
LMS
Military registration
Scientific specialties in RCAH
Learning calendars for academic year
Candidate's exams
Individual postgraduate work plan
Преподавателям
Back
Assistance to teachers
Using LMS and distance learning technologies
Academic Council
Contests and election documents
Conference of employees and students
Оплата обучения
Back
Bank requisites
Воинский учёт
Back
Military registration memo
Deferment from conscription
Conscript legislation
Citizens responsibility on not fulfilling duties for military registration
Библиотека
Back
Terms of use
Publications
RCAH Review
Archive
RCAH Review, 2025, Volume 26, Issue 3
ONTOLOGY OF GOOD IN MAX SCHELER’S AND NIKOLAI LOSSKY’S PHILOSOPHY

ONTOLOGY OF GOOD IN MAX SCHELER’S AND NIKOLAI LOSSKY’S PHILOSOPHY

2025
Volume №26
Issue 3
Publication date: 10.09.2025
Section: Философия
Savinov Rodion Valentinovich
Russian christian academy for the humanities named after F. M. Dostoevsky
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2025.4.4.029
Download article file
Download article metadata file

Annotation

The article examines a number of provisions expressed by Max Scheler and Nikolai Lossky who were the greatest philosophers of the first half of the 20th century. Article based on their works, it substantiates the position that the formation of axiological discourse during this period in parallel in the European and Russian philosophical motion. Ethical problems inevitably arose when criticizing neo- Kantian and phenomenological transcendentalism, which assumed intentional complex for access to the fundament of knowledge and action. Max Scheler and Nikolai Lossky were critics of the transcendentalist position and they develop an epistemological model of “direct access” to essential content, which is called “intuitionism”. Values were not only a purely anthropological phenomenon, but its received existential content, as fundamental characteristics of reality itself. The article is devoted to a comparison of these two concepts in Scheler’s and Lossky’s works.

Keywords

axiology, values, intuitionism, philosophy, transcendentalism, formalism, Max Scheler, Nikolai Lossky

Literature

1. Gaĭdabrus, N. V. Avenarius: soderzhanie opyta poznaniia [Avenarius: Content of
Experience of Knowledge]. In: Sotsiologiia, 2020, no. 3, pр. 318–326. (In Russian).
2. Dorofeev, D. IU. Filosofsko- antropologicheskie printsipy fenomenologicheskoĭ
aksiologii Maksa SHelera [Philosophical and anthropological Principles of Max Scheler’s
phenomenological Axiology]. In: Filosofskaia antropologiia Maksa SHelera: uroki, kritika,
perspektivy / otv. red. D. IU. Dorofeev. Saint Petersburg, Aleteĭia, 2011, pр. 82–99 (In Russian).
3. Dorofeev, D. IU. Fenomenologiia intersub”ektivnosti i sochuvstviia Maksa SHelera.
Predislovie k perevodu raboty Maksa SHelera «Sushchnost i formy simpatii» (chast
A, I–II) [Max Scheler’s phenomenology of intersubjectivity and sympathy. Preface to the
translation of Max Scheler’s book «The nature of sympathy» (section a, I–II)]. In: HORIZON.
Fenomenologicheskie issledovaniia, 2017, no. 6 (2), pр. 282–302. (In Russian).
4. Dorofeev, D. IU. Maks SHeler [Max Scheler]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka, 2019, 285, [2]
s. (In Russian).
5. Losskiĭ, N. O. Izbrannoe [Selected Works]. Moskow, 1991, 622 s. (In Russian).
6. Losskiĭ, N. O. Istoriia russkoĭ filosofii [History of Russian Philosophy]. Moskow,
Vysshaia shkola, 1991, 559 s. (In Russian).
7. Losskiĭ, N. O. Usloviia absoliutnogo dobra: Osnovy ėtiki; KHarakter russkogo naroda
[Conditions of Unconditional Good: Principles of Ethics; Character of Russians]. Moskow,
Politizdat, 1991, 368 s. (In Russian).
8. Losskiĭ, N. O. Uchenie o perevoploshchenii. Intuitivizm [Teaching for Reborning.
Intuitionism]. Moskow, IP “Progress”, VIA, 1992, 208 s. (In Russian).
9. Losskiĭ, N. O. Bog i mirovoe zlo [God and World Evil], sost. A. P. Poliakov, P. V. Alekseev,
A. A. IAkovlev. Moskow, Respublika, 1994, 432 s. (In Russian).
10. Malinkin, A. N. Kontseptsiia fenomenologii Maksa SHelera. SHeler vs Gusserl’ [Scheler’s
Concept of Phenomenology. Scheler VS Husserl]. Moskow, Russkaia shkola, 2019, 230 s.
(In Russian).
11. Sheler, M. Izbrannye proizvedeniia [Selected Works]. Moskow, Gnozis, 1994, 490 s.
(In Russian).
12. Sheler, M. K idee cheloveka [On the notion of Man]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, TSentr
gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2022, 140 s. (In Russian).
13. Fasmer, M. Ėtimologicheskiĭ slovar’ russkogo iazyka: v 4 tomakh [Etymological Lexicon
of Russian Language: in 4 voll.]. Tom IV. Moskow, Progress, 1987, 863 s. (In Russian).
14. Khaĭdegger, M. K filosofii (o sobytii) [Contributions to Philosophy (Of the Event)].
Moskow, Izdatelstvo Instituta Gaĭdara, 2020, 640 s. (In Russian).
15. Kluge, Fr. Etymological dictionary of the German language. London, Bell and Sons,
1891. xvi + 446 p.
16. Moran, D., Cohen, J. Husserl Dictionary. London: Bloomsbury Press, 2012. vi + 376 p.

The study was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 25–28–00841, https://
rscf.ru/project/25–28–00841/; Тhe Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities named after
Fyodor Dostoevsky
Социальные сети
ВКонтакте
Telegram
YouTube
Если Вы увидели на сайте неточность или ошибку - пожалуйста, напишите на электронную почту webmaster@rhga.ru
© Русская христианская гуманитарная академия