Comparative analysis of the historiosophic ideas of Konstantin Leontiev and Alexander Kojève
Annotation
The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the historiosophical views of
K. Leontiev and A. Kojève; it focuses on the problem of the “end of history”. The paper
hypothesizes that Leontiev’s historiosophy influenced Kojève`s philosophy of history. At the
beginning it is substantiated purely factually: it mentions Kojève`s Heidelberg dissertation
on Vladimir Soloviev, which testifies to the Russian- French philosopher’s erudition in the
history of Russian thought, Kojève`s communication and cooperation with the Eurasians, who
considered Leontiev his intellectual predecessor, and the fact of Kojève`s personal acquaintance
with N. Berdyaev, who in the year of Kojève`s arrival in France (1926) published a monograph
devoted to Leontiev`s philosophy. After a general disclosure and further comparison of
the historiosophic views of both philosophers, a number of conceptual points are revealed
that are present in the philosophy of both Leontiev and Kojève. Attention is drawn to the
recognition of inequality and antagonism as constitutive attributes of the historical process,
the abolition of which will result in the “end of history”, which deserves only a pessimistic,
thanatological assessment (physical and spiritual death of mankind/death of man as a negative
and logos being). It is noted that the onset of the posthistorical state is associated with
a global revolutionary process that eliminates the former hierarchical relations and social
differentiation, as well as abolishes nation- states in favor of a global homogeneous state. It is
pointed out that the French Revolution and Napoleon`s military- state activity are attributed
a key and archetypal significance in the framework of the realization of transformations of
this kind. It is fixed that posthistorical society is a radically egalitarian society, whose members
are primitive consumers, incapable of self-overcoming and creativity, and at the same time
atheists, who have made man himself an object of quasi- religious worship. In conclusion, three
conceptual points peculiar to Leontiev`s philosophy but alienating Kojève`s historiosophy
(theism, naturalization of history, aesthetic pathos) are emphasized.
Keywords
А. Kojève, K. Leontiev, philosophy of history, aestheticism, egalitarianism,
French Revolution, Napoleon Bonaparte, idea of the end of history, “desire for recognition”,
world homogeneous state
Literature
1. Kojève, A. Vvedenie v chtenie Gegelya [Introduction to the Reading of Hegel], trans.
from French by A. G. Pogonyaylo. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2013. 792 p. (In Russian).
2. Kozhevnikov, A. V. Filosofiya i V. K. P. [Philosophy and All- Union Communist Party].
In: Voprosy filosofii. 1992, no. 2, pр. 72–74. (In Russian).
3. Leontiev, K. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12-ti tomakh. T. 2 [The Complete
Works and Letters in 12 Volumes, vol. 2]. Saint Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’ Publ., 2000. 457 p.
(in Russian).
4. Leontiev, K. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12-ti tomakh. T. 7. Kn. 1 [The
Complete Works and Letters in 12 Volumes, vol. 7, book 1]. Saint Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’
Publ., 2005. 559 p. (in Russian).
5. Leontiev, K. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12-ti tomakh. T. 7. Kn. 2 [The
Complete Works and Letters in 12 Volumes, vol. 7, book 2]. Saint Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’
Publ., 2006. 1019 p. (in Russian).
6. Leontiev, K. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12-ti tomakh. T. 8. Kn. 1 [The
Complete Works and Letters in 12 Volumes, vol. 8, book 1]. Saint Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’
Publ., 2007. 638 p. (in Russian).
7. Leontiev, K. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12-ti tomakh. T. 8. Kn. 2 [The
Complete Works and Letters in 12 Volumes, vol. 8, book 2]. Saint Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’
Publ., 2009. 1402 p. (in Russian).
8. Leontiev, K. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12-ti tomakh. T. 9 [The Complete
Works and Letters in 12 Volumes, vol. 9]. Saint Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’ Publ., 2014. 978 p.
(in Russian).
9. Pis’ma K. N. Leont’eva k I. I. Fudeliu [Letters of K. N. Leontiev to I. I. Fudel]. Leont’ev
K. N. Izbrannye pis’ma 1854–1891. Saint Petersburg, Pushkinskii fond Publ., 1993, pр. 528–555
(in Russian).
10. Pis’mo K. N. Leont’eva k K. A. Gubastovu ot 15 marta 1889 g. [Letter from K. N. Leontiev
to K. A. Gubastov dated March 15, 1889]. Leont’ev K. N. Izbrannye pis’ma 1854–1891. Saint
Petersburg, Pushkinskii fond Publ., 1993, pр. 436–439 (in Russian).
11. Rozanov, V. V. K. Leont’ev ob Apollone Grigor’eve [Rozanov, V. V. K. Leontiev on
Apollon Grigoryev]. V. V. Rozanov i K. N. Leont’ev. Materialy neizdannoi knigi “Literaturnye
izgnanniki”. Perepiska. Neopublikovannye teksty. Stat’i o K. N. Leont’eve. Kommentarii. Saint
Petersburg, Rostok Publ., 2014, pр. 1080–1093 (in Russian).
12. Rossman, V. Posle filosofii: Kozhev, “konets istorii” i russkaia mysl’ [After Philosophy:
Kojève, “The End of History” and Russian Thought] (1999). [Electronic resource] URL: https://
magazines.gorky.media/nz/1999/5/posle- filosofii-kozhev- konecz-istorii-i-russkaya-mysl.html
(accessed 07.03.2023) (in Russian).
13. Rutkevich, A. M. Aleksandr Kozhev (A. V. Kozhevnikov) [Alexander Kojève
(A. V. Kozhevnikov)]. Perekrestki kul’tur: Aleksandr Kojre, Aleksandr Kozhev, Isajya Berlin. Ed.
by O. L. Granovskaya, D. N. Drozdova, A. M. Rutkevich. Moskow, Politicheskaya enciklopediya
Publ., 2021, pр. 203–360 (in Russian).
14. Svetlov, R. V. Imperiia i Rossiia: versii K. Leont’eva i O. Shpenglera [Empire and
Russia: versions of K. Leontiev and O. Spengler]. In: Russkaia filosofiia, 2021, no. 2, pр. 94–107
(in Russian).
15. Solovyov, V. S. Leont’ev [Leontiev]. In: Filosofskii slovar’ Vladimira Solov’eva. Rostovon- Don, Feniks Publ., 1997, pр. 240–245 (in Russian).
16. Fetisenko, O. L. “Geptastilisty”: Konstantin Leont’ev, ego sobesedniki i ucheniki
[“Heptastylists”: Konstantin Leontiev, his interlocutors and disciples]. In: Tetradi po
konservatizmu, 2015, no. 2, pр. 117–174 (in Russian).
17. Jameson, F. The Hegel Variations: On the Phenomenology of Spirit. London, Verso,
2010. 146 p. (In English).
18. Koschewnikoff A. Die religiöse Philosophie Wladimir Solowjews. Heidelberg,
Heidelberg Univ., 1926. 481 p. (in German).
19. Lapouge, G. “Les philosophes ne m’intéressent pas, je cherche des sages”, une
conversation avec Alexandre Kojève (2020). [Electronic resource] URL: https://legrandcontinent.
eu/fr/2020/12/25/conversation- alexandre-kojeve/ (accessed 07.02.2023) (in French).
20. Roth, M. S. Knowing and History: Appropriations of Hegel in Twentieth- century
France. Ithaca NY, Cornell University Press, 1988. 270 p. (in English).
The article was prepared as part of the implementation of the I. Kant Baltic Federal University
project “Above the Rift: Russia and the Western World in Russian Philosophy”.