«Mikulina». The literary and political project: criticism from below article one
Publication date: 14.12.2025
Section: Культурология
Kondakov Igor Vadimovich
The A. I. Herzen State Pedagogical University, Тhe Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities named after Fyodor Dostoevsky
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2025.4.4.057
Download article file
Download article metadata file
Annotation
“Elena Mikulina” — almost no one remembers this writer’s name today. A Stalinist
appointee in the year of the Great Breakthrough, who studied at a provincial party school
and had no life experience, became an author for whom all doors of publishing houses and
publications were open. The literary and political project that Mikulina was involved in was
based on the assumption that a simple story by a “people’s girl” would spark widespread interest
in the competition across the country, which would have a significant impact on the economy
and political climate in the Soviet Union, as well as strengthen the already unshakable authority
of the leader. However, the very first book written by Mikulina based on a specific ideological
assignment and documented facts caused a scandal due to the glaring discrepancy between the
literary description and reality. The book’s initiator was Stalin, who wrote a preface to it and
made it famous, and later defended it from public criticism by comparing it to Sholokhov’s
novel “And Quiet Flows the Don”, in which Stalin believed that the author had made “crude
mistakes” that were even worse than Mikulina’s. However, Mikulina’s “project” ultimately
failed due to its lack of literary or ideological merit. It was the first attempt at socialist realism
before the advent of socialist realism.
Keywords
Mikulina, Stalin, Sholokhov, the idea and practice of social competition,
journalism, propaganda, a literary and political project, criticism from below
Literature
1. Bol’shaya tsenzura. Pisateli i zhurnalisty v strane sovetov [The Great Censorship.
Writers and Journalists in the Country of Soviets]. 1917–1956. (2005) / Pod obschej ped. akad.
A. N. Yakovleva; sostavitel’; L. V. Maksimenkov. Moskow, Mezhdunarodnyj fond “Demokratiya”;
“Materik” Publ. 752 s. (in Russian).
2. Zhirnov, E. Ispol’zovaniye v korystnyh tselyah zvaniya korrespondenta [The Use of
the Title of Correspondent for Self- Gaining Purposes]. In: “Kommersant- Vlast’”, 2008, no. 21,
February 6, pр. 66–71 (in Russian).
3. Mikulina, E. Sorevnovaniye mass [Mass Competition] / Predisloviye I. Stalina. Moskow,
Leningrad, Gosizdat Publ., 1929. 56 s. (in Russian).
4. Soifer, V. N. Vlast’ i nauka. Istoriya razgroma genetiki v SSSR [Power and Science.
The History of the Destruction of Genetics in the USSR]. Moskow, Lazur’ Publ., 1993. 706 s.
(in Russian).
5. Stalin, I. V. (1949). Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 12. Moskow, Gosudarstvennoye
izdatel’stvo politicheskoj literatury Publ., 1949. 398 s. (in Russian).
6. Chuev, F. I. (1998). Soldaty imperii. Besedy. Vospominaniya. Dokumenty [Soldiers of
the Empire: Conversations. Memoirs. Documents].Moskow, KOVCHEG Publ., 1998. 559 s.
(The dossier) (in Russian).
The study was funded by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation No. 24–18–00636,
https://rscf.ru/project/24–18–00636/; the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy named after
Fyodor Dostoevsky.