Диссертационный совет
Back
Психологические исследования
Back
Вестник РХГА. Филологические науки
Back
Фотогалерея
Back
Menu
Абитуриентам
Back
Applicant's personal account
Programs for admission
Educations costs
Tuition benefits
Open days
FAQ
Dormitory
For applicants and parents
Applicants lists and orders for enrollment
Колледж
Back
About college
College news
Education programs
LMS
Студентам
Back
LMS
Learning calendars for academic year
Tuition fees
Military registration
Library
Social support measures for students
Academic center for psychological assistance
Career center
Аспирантам
Back
Final certification
Library
LMS
Military registration
Scientific specialties in RCAH
Learning calendars for academic year
Candidate's exams
Individual postgraduate work plan
Преподавателям
Back
Assistance to teachers
Using LMS and distance learning technologies
Academic Council
Contests and election documents
Conference of employees and students
Оплата обучения
Back
Bank requisites
Воинский учёт
Back
Military registration memo
Deferment from conscription
Conscript legislation
Citizens responsibility on not fulfilling duties for military registration
Библиотека
Back
Terms of use
Publications
RCAH Review
Archive
RCAH Review, 2025, Volume 26, Issue 2
ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY ON THE RUSSIAN STAGE AND PHENOMENOLOGY

ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY ON THE RUSSIAN STAGE AND PHENOMENOLOGY

2025
Volume №26
Issue 2
Publication date: 19.06.2025
Section: Философия
Kolesnikov Anatolii Sergeevich
; Тhe Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities named after Fyodor Dostoevsky
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2025.2.2.006
Download article file
Download article metadata file

Annotation

The article analyzes the relationship and mutual influence of analytical philosophy and phenomenology. Thus, some common features of the interests and doctrines of early analytical philosophy and phenomenology are demonstrated, which are becoming better known, as well as historical connections between such philosophers as Russell, Moore, Brentano and Meinong, Frege and Husserl, Ryle and Heidegger. There are historical and methodological connections, which are partly presented in the article. The history of the “divergence” of the paths of analysts and phenomenologists is presented in part, with a special emphasis on the work of Gilbert Ryle. Doctrinal differences between the schools of analytical philosophy and phenomenology also played a role, but the unifying factor is the awareness of the extent to which the world can be understood or cognized through the study of human experience, thought or language.

Keywords

Russell, Husserl, Ryle, analytical philosophy, phenomenology

Literature

1. Alexander S. II: Collective Willing and Truth. In: Mind, 1913, 22, pр. 14–47.
2. Austin J. L. A Plea for Excuses. In: Philosophical Papers. Eds. J. Urmson. and
G. Warnock. Oxford: OUP, 1961.
3. Bosanquet B. Review of Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Phänomenologische Forschung.
In: Mind,1914, 23, pр. 587–597.
4. Brentano F. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Translated by Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, L. L. McAlister. London: Routledge, 1995.
5. Briggs A., Alan I., E. Martin, eds. Who’s who in the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1999.
6. Chase J., Reynolds J. Analytic Versus Continental: Arguments on The Methods and
Value of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2011.
7. Dummett M. Origins of Analytical Philosophy, London: Duckworth,1993.
8. Durfee Harold A., ed. Analytic philosophy and phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus
Nijhoff, 1976.
9. Hicks G. D. The Philosophy of Husserl. In: Hibbert Journal, 1913–14, 13, pр. 198–202.
10. Honderich T., ed. Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1995.
11. Huemer W. The Constitution of Consciousness: A Study in Analytic Phenomenology.
London: Routledge, 2005.
12. Kusch M. Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge.
London: Routledge, 1995.
13. Marcel G. Tragic Wisdom and Beyond, Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1973.
14. Mays Wolfe, and S. C. Brown, eds. Linguistic analysis and phenomenology. Lewisburg:
Bucknell University Press, 1969.
15. Mohanty J. N. “Reply to Sellars”. R. Bruzina, eds. In: Crosscurrents in Phenomenology,
1978, vol. 7, pр. 186–198.
16. Mohanty J. N. Husserl and Frege. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1982.
17. Monk R. Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude. London: Jonathan Cape, 1996.
18. Moran D. Introduction to phenomenology. London: Routledge, 2000.
19. Mulligan K., Simons P., Smith B. What is wrong with contemporary philosophy? In:
Topoi, 2006, vol. 25, pр. 63–67.
20. Overgaard S. Revisiting Royaumont. In: British Journal for the History of Philosophy,
2010, 18:5, pр. 899–924.
21. Preston A. Analytic Philosophy: The History of an Illusion. London: Continuum,
2007.
22. Royce Josiah. The World and the Individual In: International Journal of Ethics, 1902,
12 (3), pр. 389–398.
23. Russell B. Letter to G. F. Stout, 10 June 1918, #119573, Box 6.27, Bertrand Russell
Archives, McMaster University, http://bracers.mcmaster.ca/119573.
24. Russell B. Letter to E. Husserl, 19 April 1920, #95393, Box 5.47, Bertrand Russell
Archives, McMaster University, http://bracers.mcmaster.ca/95393.
24. Russell B. The Analysis of Mind. London: Allen and Unwin, 1921.
25. Russell B. Philosophy in the Twentieth Century, Sceptical Essays. London: Norton, 1928.
26. Russell B. Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript, Collected Papers volume 7,
London: George Allen and Unwin, 1984.
27. Russell E. Letter to F. Gusberti- Cazzani, 26 June 1961, #24183, Box 6.08, Bertrand
Russell Archives, McMaster University, http://bracers.mcmaster.ca/24183.
28. Ryle G. The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949/2009.
29. Ryle G. Dilemmas. Cambridge: CUP, 1952.
30. Ryle G. Autobiographical. In: Wood, Oscar P., and George Pitcher, eds. Ryle. New
York: Doubleday and Co Wood and Pitcher, 1970.
31. Ryle G. Critical Essays: Collected Papers Volume 1. London: Routledge, 1971/2009.
32. Ryle G. Collected papers volume 2: Collected essays. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1971.
33. Ryle G. Review of Essentiale Fragen: Ein Beitrag zum, 1927.
34. Problem des Wesens, by Roman Ingarden. In: Mind 36, no. 143, рp. 366–70.
35 .Schmid A.-F. ed. Bertrand Russell: Correspondance sur la philosophie, la logique et
la politique avec Louis Couturat (1897–1913). Paris: Éditions Kimé, 2001. #82/
36. Sellars W. “Some Reflections on Perceptual Consciousness”. In: Ronald Bruzina and
Bruce Wilshire (eds), Crosscurrents in Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1978, pр. 169–85.
37. Simons P. Philosophy and logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1992.
38. Smith J. The Russell- Meinong Debate. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
1985, vol. 45, рp. 305–350.
39. Spiegelberg H. The Context of the Phenomenological Movement, Dordrecht: Kluwer,
1981.
40. Stroll A. 2000. Twentieth- century analytic philosophy. New York: Columbia University
Press, 2000.
41. Thomasson A. Phenomenology and the Development of Analytic Philosophy. In:
Southern Journal of Philosophy, 2002, vol. XL, pр. 115–33.
42. Tugendhat E. Description as the method of philosophy in Mays, Wolfe, and S. C. Brown,
eds. 1969. Linguistic analysis and phenomenology. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press,
1969, pр. 256–66.
43. Urmson J. Philosophical Analysis: Its Development Between the Wars, Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1956/1967.
44. Warnock G. L. English Philosophy since 1900. Second Edition, Greenwood Press, 1982.
45. Warnock M. A Memoir: People and Places. London: Duckworth, 2002.
46. Wittgenstein L. Culture and Value, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.

The study was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 24–28–00295, https://
rscf.ru/project/24–28–00295/; Тhe Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities named after
Fyodor Dostoevsky, 15, Fontanka Embankment, Saint Petersburg, 191023, Russian Federation.
Социальные сети
ВКонтакте
Telegram
YouTube
Если Вы увидели на сайте неточность или ошибку - пожалуйста, напишите на электронную почту webmaster@rhga.ru
© Русская христианская гуманитарная академия